![]() ![]() There's a popular example going around on the latter – repeated to me independently by someone close to a major franchise – of Shea Weber. One of the topics for their discussions could centre, in part, on aggressive deals rich clubs are able to make on players from mid-level teams. Part of what the lockout does now, is allow the owners the ability to talk to one another – something they were prevented from doing prior to this point due to the fact that they could not collude while the old CBA was still in effect. The OwnersĪs much as this stalemate is a product of the NHLPA and the league disagreeing, there are a few things the owners need to settle between themselves before much more movement occurs with the players. Now, we will all have to keep waiting to see if the two sides can reach a deal and salvage the season. So, the deadline passed and as it did in 2004-05, the NHL is faced with a lockout. Neither of those main issues has been solved, and there are a handful of smaller, related issues orbiting the core discussions that are also still languishing in nowhereland, like free agency rules and a new salary cap. Such a return to the current share would probably also spark renewed risk of another lockout in the future. But, given the owners want that percentage of revenues to be lower, they didn't like the sound of the players' share popping back up to its current state a few years down the road. After that, it would go back to the way it is now, with the players taking their 57% share of revenue. The union suggested the players should receive a bump of 2% in the first year, 4% for the second and 6% in the third. In an attempt to assuage the owners, earlier this summer the NHLPA offered to untie players' salaries from league revenues, and instead go to a system whereby a fixed rate of increase would be established. That's only a problem if you think the players are earning too much. As the league makes more, so do the players. The second major discussion point for the two sides has been player salaries. Largely, the league's goal is for there to eventually be a 50-50 split in HRR distribution. At the CBC, Elliotte Friedman points out some changes the league wants to make, to give you an idea of what sort of stuff is involved. As it happens, both the NHLPA and NHL are also still trying to figure out the answer to that. The league wants the players share of HRR to drop from 57% to 49%, and then eventually to 47%. The two main issues separating the two sides are the players' share of what's called hockey-related revenue (HRR) and player salaries. This means the players are now locked out, and technically free to play elsewhere. After a summer of negotiations between the NHL players' union and the league, the two sides failed to settle on a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) before the deadline of 11:59pm Saturday. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |